Talk:Founder

=Founder and Rights= Should there be an Notice that an founder has the right to give himself all u_ and m_ permissions? A Founder can't be restricted without removing the founder Status --Emanuelle 1982 16:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * There is "This user (Founder) is able to access all administrative areas of the board regardless of assigned permission" - that of course includes the permission category. --Pyramide 21:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I've seen that, but first I thought that he has all permissions, OK I was wrong. Than I thought - hey cool, he can't access all forums and can't moderate <- a bit of a technician supporter, but that was also wrong - he can give himself each permission he likes... so... where is the sense of NOT giving all rights?
 * It's only an opinion, but either he has all rights or he has all administration rights, without the right to change own permissions - but in the last version there must be a 'Superfounder', which has all rights... so all rights to each founder would be the correct way... but as said... just an opinion
 * --Emanuelle 1982 05:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)